Join:
2006/12/07
Messages:
29893
Select your timezone:
Manne wrote:
A state appeals court rejected Lee Rousso's arguments that a 2006 law that forbids Internet gambling in the state violates the clause of the U.S. Constitution that gives the federal government the right to regulate interstate commerce.
The unanimous decision by three judges of division I of the appeals court says that Rousso would have to show that policing Internet poker imposes excessive burdens and not worth the state's commitment to regulating gaming.
Rousso said appeals court rejected many of the state's arguments in the case, so he is leaning in favor of taking the case to the state Supreme Court.
:dirol
It's time for Washington to wake up😡
Join:
2006/12/11
Messages:
1758
Manne wrote:
A state appeals court rejected Lee Rousso's arguments that a 2006 law that forbids Internet gambling in the state violates the clause of the U.S. Constitution that gives the federal government the right to regulate interstate commerce.
The unanimous decision by three judges of division I of the appeals court says that Rousso would have to show that policing Internet poker imposes excessive burdens and not worth the state's commitment to regulating gaming.
Rousso said appeals court rejected many of the state's arguments in the case, so he is leaning in favor of taking the case to the state Supreme Court.
:dirol
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
Join:
2007/02/24
Messages:
1205
Manne wrote:
A state appeals court rejected Lee Rousso's arguments that a 2006 law that forbids Internet gambling in the state violates the clause of the U.S. Constitution that gives the federal government the right to regulate interstate commerce.
The unanimous decision by three judges of division I of the appeals court says that Rousso would have to show that policing Internet poker imposes excessive burdens and not worth the state's commitment to regulating gaming.
Rousso said appeals court rejected many of the state's arguments in the case, so he is leaning in favor of taking the case to the state Supreme Court.
:dirol
One major factor that will be necessary to sway the odds in the favor of the poker industry is the voices of the masses. It is more important than ever that we get involved, especially by letting members of Congress—and President Obama—know how we feel. The Poker Players Alliance provides easy access to governmental representatives. Visit Poker Players Alliance Home for more information.
Speak up. :dirol
Speak up. :dirol
Join:
2006/12/07
Messages:
29893
kennex wrote:
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
Notorious for having some of the toughest anti-Internet gambling laws in the United States, but at the same time an active promoter of land gambling expansion, the state of Washington presents a very confusing moral 😁
Notorious for having some of the toughest anti-Internet gambling laws in the United States, but at the same time an active promoter of land gambling expansion, the state of Washington presents a very confusing moral 😁
Join:
2006/12/11
Messages:
1758
mike1 wrote:
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
Notorious for having some of the toughest anti-Internet gambling laws in the United States, but at the same time an active promoter of land gambling expansion, the state of Washington presents a very confusing moral 😁
Notorious for having some of the toughest anti-Internet gambling laws in the United States, but at the same time an active promoter of land gambling expansion, the state of Washington presents a very confusing moral 😁
However the push for legalizing and regulating the industry is now stronger than ever!! 😁
However the push for legalizing and regulating the industry is now stronger than ever!! 😁
Join:
2006/12/07
Messages:
29893
kennex wrote:
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
The door is open for the case to be taken to the state Supreme Court!!
Lawmakers should stay away from online poker!!
Lawmakers should stay away from online poker!!
Join:
2006/12/07
Messages:
29893
.jpg?v=1.014689139)
.png?v=1.014689139)
The unanimous decision by three judges of division I of the appeals court says that Rousso would have to show that policing Internet poker imposes excessive burdens and not worth the state's commitment to regulating gaming.
Rousso said appeals court rejected many of the state's arguments in the case, so he is leaning in favor of taking the case to the state Supreme Court.
:dirol